CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2100T vs 6400K

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD A6 6400K 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 6400K  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 6400K

AMD A6 6400K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2100T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2100T

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 12.43 pt/W vs 6.51 pt/W More than 90% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A6 6400K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 6400K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much better performance per dollar 12.62 pt/$ vs 3.43 pt/$ Around 3.8x better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.78 GHz vs 2.63 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 800 MHz vs 650 MHz Around 25% higher GPU clock speed
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 70 °C vs 65 °C Around 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,394 vs 1,217 Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2100T vs A6 6400K

GeekBench (32-bit)

A6 6400K
4,094

GeekBench

A6 6400K
4,094

Passmark (Single Core)

A6 6400K
1,394

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2100T  vs
A6 6400K 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No Yes
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
AVX 1.1
SSE
SSE4.2
AMD64
AVX
XOP
SSE3
FMA3
SSE2
FMA4
F16C
ABM
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
TBM
CVT16
AMD-V
BMI1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 12.43 pt/W 6.51 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W

details

Core i3 2100T  vs
A6 6400K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.63 GHz 4.78 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz 3.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.63 GHz 4.78 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2000 Radeon™ HD 8470D
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Intel Core i3 2100T
Report a correction
AMD A6 6400K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus