Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 2100

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2100

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,583 vs 487 More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,786 vs 1,257 More than 3.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.23 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.23 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 98.28W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 69.1 °C Around 45% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 37.88 $/year 4.5x lower annual home energy cost
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 93.47 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2100 vs Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2100  vs
Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72 
Clock speed 3.1 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i3 2100  vs
Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.23 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.23 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.23 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 37.88 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 93.47 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.41 pt/W 1.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 98.28W 28.44W
Intel Core i3 2100
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus