0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs AMD E2 3000M |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i3 2100
- 3.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 2100
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 4,738 |
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz | ![]() | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,583 |
VS
Released June, 2011
AMD E2 3000M
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E2 3000M
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 70% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 4,738 | vs | 1,564 | More than 3x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,583 | vs | 601 | Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,786 | vs | 1,733 | More than 2.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l3 cache per core | |||
More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.23 GHz | vs | 2.21 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.23 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 98.28W | 3.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | Around 45% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 37.88 $/year | 4.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 93.47 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly better performance per watt | 2.05 pt/W | vs | 1.41 pt/W | More than 45% better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jun, 2011 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date 5 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2100 vs E2 3000M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2100
4,786
E2 3000M
1,733
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2100
2,258
E2 3000M
953
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2100
153,100 MB/s
E2 3000M
74,500 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2100
4,738
E2 3000M
1,564
GeekBench
Core i3 2100
7,901
E2 3000M
2,249
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 2100
3,664
E2 3000M
1,097
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 2100
1,583
E2 3000M
601
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 2100 | vs | E2 3000M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 37.88 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 93.47 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.41 pt/W | 2.05 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 98.28W | 28.44W |
details | Core i3 2100 | vs | E2 3000M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 31 | 12 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.23 GHz | 2.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.23 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.23 GHz | 2.21 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | Radeon™ HD 6380G | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 400 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 |
Intel Core i3 2100 ![]() | AMD E2 3000M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | ||
2100 vs 1200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $205 | |
2100 vs 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | ||
2100 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $179 | |
2100 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $125 | |
2100 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $76 | |
2100 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $75 | |
2100 vs G2020 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||