Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 2100

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2100

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 1.05 GHz Around 3x higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 2.8x higher GPU clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,583 vs 418 More than 3.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 3,664 vs 767 More than 4.8x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD E1 2200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2200

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 98.28W 13.4x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 69.1 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 37.88 $/year 17.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly better performance per watt 4.35 pt/W vs 1.41 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 93.47 $/year 11.9x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Nov, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2100 vs E1 2200

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 2100
3,664
E1 2200
767

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 2100
1,583
E1 2200
418

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2100  vs
E1 2200 
Clock speed 3.1 GHz 1.05 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
BGA 769
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 10,666.66 MB/s

details

Core i3 2100  vs
E1 2200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2000 Radeon HD 8210
GPU clock speed 850 MHz 300 MHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 9W
Annual home energy cost 37.88 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 93.47 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.41 pt/W 4.35 pt/W
Typical power consumption 98.28W 7.31W
Intel Core i3 2100
Report a correction
AMD E1 2200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus