Intel Core i3 2100 vs AMD E1 2200 |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i3 2100
- 3.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 2100
 | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | | Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz |
| | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,583 | | Better PassMark score 3,664 |
VS
Released November, 2013
AMD E1 2200
- 1.05 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 2200
| | Much lower typical power consumption 7.31W | | More l2 cache 1 MB |
| | Newer manufacturing process 28 nm | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 2100CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 1.05 GHz | Around 3x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 2.8x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,583 | vs | 418 | More than 3.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,664 | vs | 767 | More than 4.8x better PassMark score | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 7.31W | vs | 98.28W | 13.4x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.17 $/year | vs | 37.88 $/year | 17.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 4.35 pt/W | vs | 1.41 pt/W | More than 3x better performance per watt | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 7.88 $/year | vs | 93.47 $/year | 11.9x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Nov, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2100 vs E1 2200
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 2100 | vs | E1 2200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.05 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| BGA 769 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
details | Core i3 2100 | vs | E1 2200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 28 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | Radeon HD 8210 | |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 9W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 37.88 $/year | 2.17 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 93.47 $/year | 7.88 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.41 pt/W | 4.35 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 98.28W | 7.31W | |
 Intel Core i3 2100  Report a correction |  AMD E1 2200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $150 | ||
| 1200 vs 2100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $150 | |
| 2400 vs 2100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $150 | |
| 3220 vs 2100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | ||
| Q6600 vs 2100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $150 | |
| E8400 vs 2100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $70 | $150 | |
| G620 vs 2100 | ||
 | VS | |
| $76 | $150 | |
| G2030 vs 2100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
