Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Solo U1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo U1500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core Solo U1500 vs the Atom Z3740.

Front view of Intel Atom Z3740

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3740

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Solo U1500 vs Atom Z3740

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Solo U1500  vs
Atom Z3740 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
479
BGA 1380

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 2W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 0.48 $/year
Performance per watt 5.58 pt/W 73.77 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.47W 1.63W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core Solo U1500  vs
Atom Z3740 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.1V 0.4 - 1.14V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.55 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.33 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.33 GHz 1.55 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A HD (Ivy Bridge)
GPU clock speed N/A 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 667 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core Solo U1500
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3740
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus