Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Solo U1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo U1500

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2760

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Solo U1500 vs Atom Z2760

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Solo U1500  vs
Atom Z2760 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 2W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 0.48 $/year
Performance per watt 5.58 pt/W 16.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.47W 1.63W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core Solo U1500  vs
Atom Z2760 
Architecture x86 x86
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.33 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.33 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated
GPU clock speed N/A 533 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core Solo U1500
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2760
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus