0 Comments
| Intel Core Solo U1300 vs Atom N270 |
Released April, 2006
Intel Core Solo U1300
- 1.06 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core Solo U1300
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N270 vs the Core Solo U1300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Solo U1300 vs Atom N270
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Solo U1300
867
Atom N270
491
GeekBench
Core Solo U1300
867
Atom N270
854
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core Solo U1300
276
Atom N270
271
PassMark (Single Core)
Core Solo U1300
348
Atom N270
236
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Solo U1300 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 2.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.19 pt/W | 9.71 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 2.03W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Core Solo U1300 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.1V | 0.9 - 1.16V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.07 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.07 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.07 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core Solo U1300 ![]() | Intel Atom N270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
N270 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
N270 vs N455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $42 | |
N270 vs N2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $69 | |
N270 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
N270 vs 353 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $63 | |
N270 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $17 | |
N270 vs Z3735F | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||