Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Solo T1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1500

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Celeron M 420

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 420

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 420 vs the Core Solo T1500.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Solo T1500 vs Celeron M 420

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Solo T1500  vs
Celeron M 420 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
M
479
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

details

Core Solo T1500  vs
Celeron M 420 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W

bus

Clock speed 667 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Core Solo T1500
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 420
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus