Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Solo T1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1500

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Sempron 145

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 145

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 882 vs 689 Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Solo T1500 vs Sempron 145

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Solo T1500  vs
Sempron 145 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
M
479
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core Solo T1500  vs
Sempron 145 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 36.56W

bus

Clock speed 667 MHz 2,000 MHz
Intel Core Solo T1500
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 145
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus