Winner
Intel Celeron M 450
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 450 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel Core Solo T1350 vs Celeron M 450 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Core Solo T1350
- 1.86 GHz
- Single core
4.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core Solo T1350
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released August, 2008
Intel Celeron M 450
- 2.2 GHz
- Single core
4.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Celeron M 450
| | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 92,100 MB/s | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T1350 vs 450 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Celeron M 450CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 92,100 MB/s | vs | 73,900 MB/s | Around 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | vs | 2.72 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.12 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.63 pt/W | vs | 1.78 pt/W | Around 50% better performance per watt | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Solo T1350 vs Celeron M 450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Solo T1350 | vs | Celeron M 450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| Slot 1 | |||
| M | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 31W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 27.16 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.78 pt/W | 2.63 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 533 MHz | 800 MHz | |
details | Core Solo T1350 | vs | Celeron M 450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 105,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 14 | 11 | |
| Voltage range | 0.95 - 1.26V | 1 - 1.34V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.72 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | 3.12 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.72 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
 Intel Core Solo T1350  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron M 450 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
