0 Comments
| Intel Core M3-6Y30 vs M 5Y10 |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core M3-6Y30
- 0.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core M3-6Y30
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 35.6 | ![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz |
![]() | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 2.2 GHz | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,388.5 |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Core M 5Y10
- 0.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the M 5Y10
![]() | Much better performance per watt 225.42 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core M3-6Y30CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 35.6 | vs | 31.4 | Around 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | 3x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 2,388.5 | vs | 1,916 | Around 25% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,647.5 | vs | 3,797 | More than 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 225.42 pt/W | vs | 30.69 pt/W | More than 7.2x better performance per watt |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core M3-6Y30 vs M 5Y10
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core M3-6Y30
4,647.5
Core M 5Y10
3,797
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core M3-6Y30
2,388.5
Core M 5Y10
1,916
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s
Core M 5Y10
2,720,000 MB/s
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core M3-6Y30
35.6
Core M 5Y10
31.4
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core M3-6Y30
3,056
Core M 5Y10
2,722
PassMark (Single Core)
Core M3-6Y30
1,183
Core M 5Y10
1,048
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core M3-6Y30 | vs | M 5Y10 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 0.8 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 4.5W | 4.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.08 $/year | 1.08 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 3.94 $/year | 3.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 30.69 pt/W | 225.42 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 3.66W | 3.66W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core M3-6Y30 | vs | M 5Y10 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.02 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 0.9 GHz | 0.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.02 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 100 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 850 MHz | 800 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Core M3-6Y30 ![]() | Intel Core M 5Y10 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 4300U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 4020Y | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 6100U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
M3-6Y30 vs 5200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
5Y10 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
5Y10 vs 5200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 4 comments.
Harith_Humam (07:29 AM, November 29, 2016)
Der_Gerät (05:25 PM, February 2, 2016)
l Yutaka l (08:05 PM, January 22, 2016)
Pete P (08:39 AM, January 2, 2016)