Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core M3-6Y30

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M3-6Y30

Report a correction
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz vs 100 MHz 3x higher GPU clock speed
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 35.6 vs 31.4 Around 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,388.5 vs 1,916 Around 25% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better turbo clock speed 850 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,647.5 vs 3,797 More than 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jul, 2014 Release date a year later
Front view of Intel Core M 5Y10

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M 5Y10

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 225.42 pt/W vs 30.69 pt/W More than 7.2x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core M3-6Y30 vs M 5Y10

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core M3-6Y30
4,647.5
Core M 5Y10
3,797

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core M3-6Y30
2,388.5
Core M 5Y10
1,916

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core M3-6Y30
3,015 MB/s
Core M 5Y10
2,720,000 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core M3-6Y30  vs
M 5Y10 
Clock speed 0.9 GHz 0.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 4.5W 4.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year 1.08 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year 3.94 $/year
Performance per watt 30.69 pt/W 225.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 3.66W 3.66W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core M3-6Y30  vs
M 5Y10 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.02 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.9 GHz 0.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.02 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 515 Intel® HD Graphics 5300
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 100 MHz
Turbo clock speed 850 MHz 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core M3-6Y30
Report a correction
Intel Core M 5Y10
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Have you found it?
wish granted: http://www.geekbuying.com/item/Cube-i9-Windows10-Ultrabook-4GB-128GB-12-2--Tablet-PC-Intel-Core-M3-Dual-Core-1-51GHz-IPS-1920-1200-Type-C-HDMI---Blue-362927.html
wanna w8 Cube i9 PC tablet with new processor ^ ^
Has anyone found a good comparison of performance between the new Core M3 and the older Core M? I couldn't dig up anything on the web.
comments powered by Disqus