Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core M3-6Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M3-6Y30

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.02 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 1500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 1500+

Report a correction
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core M3-6Y30  vs Athlon 64 1500+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core M3-6Y30
2.02 GHz
Athlon 64 1500+
1.3 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core M3-6Y30  vs
Athlon 64 1500+ 
Clock speed 0.9 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

details

Core M3-6Y30  vs
Athlon 64 1500+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.02 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.9 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.02 GHz 1.3 GHz

power consumption

TDP 4.5W 9W
Annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year 7.88 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.66W 7.31W
Intel Core M3-6Y30
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 1500+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus