Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core M 5Y71

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core M 5Y71

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core M 5Y71

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M 5Y71

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 37.1 vs 23.1 More than 60% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 11.63 mPixels/s vs 5.37 mPixels/s Around 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Higher turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,273 vs 553 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz vs 200 MHz 50% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,320 vs 3,246 Around 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 4.22 pt/$ vs 3.42 pt/$ Around 25% better performance per dollar
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 2014 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core M 5Y71 vs Atom x7 x7-Z8700

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core M 5Y71
21.1 mHash/s
Atom x7 x7-Z8700
8.39 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core M 5Y71
11.63 mPixels/s
Atom x7 x7-Z8700
5.37 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core M 5Y71
0.72 fps
Atom x7 x7-Z8700
0.51 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core M 5Y71
3,630,000 MB/s
Atom x7 x7-Z8700
389,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core M 5Y71  vs
Atom x7 x7-Z8700 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

Typical power consumption 3.66W N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core M 5Y71  vs
Atom x7 x7-Z8700 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.52 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.52 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5300 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core M 5Y71
Report a correction
Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus