Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core M 5Y10c

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M 5Y10c

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Atom Z3736G

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3736G

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3736G vs the Core M 5Y10c.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core M 5Y10c vs Atom Z3736G

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core M 5Y10c
2,730,000 MB/s
Atom Z3736G
260.8 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core M 5Y10c  vs
Atom Z3736G 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 1.33 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2 GHz 2.16 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5300 Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 300 MHz 313 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 1,024 MB

details

Core M 5Y10c  vs
Atom Z3736G 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.98 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.8 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.98 GHz 1.33 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 3.66W N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core M 5Y10c
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3736G
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus