Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core M 5Y10c

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core M 5Y10c

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo 40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo 40

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon Neo 40 vs the Intel Core M 5Y10c.

Features Key features of the Core M 5Y10c  vs Athlon Neo 40 

clock speed

Core M 5Y10c
0.8 GHz
Athlon Neo 40
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Core M 5Y10c
0.5 MB
Athlon Neo 40
0.5 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core M 5Y10c  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core M 5Y10c  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 5300 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 4.5W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year 3.61 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.66W 12.19W
Intel Core M 5Y10c
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo 40
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus