0 Comments
| Intel Core Duo T2600 vs Celeron M 370 |
Released January, 2006
Intel Core Duo T2600
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core Duo T2600
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 370 vs the Core Duo T2600. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2600 vs Celeron M 370
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core Duo T2600
941
Celeron M 370
2,023
PassMark (Single Core)
Core Duo T2600
662
Celeron M 370
916
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Duo T2600 | vs | Celeron M 370 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 31W | 21W | |
Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 5.06 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.05 pt/W | 4.42 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 17.06W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
details | Core Duo T2600 | vs | Celeron M 370 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 144,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 15 | |
Voltage range | 1.16 - 1.3V | 1 - 1.29V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.16 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Core Duo T2600 ![]() | Intel Celeron M 370 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||