Winner
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900 based on its performance, power consumption and value.
See full details | Intel Core Duo T2500 vs Celeron J1900 |
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 79,550 MB/s | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Celeron J1900CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 79,550 MB/s | vs | 56,900 MB/s | Around 40% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,887 | vs | 1,336 | Around 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2006 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 25.19W | 3.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.52 pt/$ | vs | 0.29 pt/$ | Around 85% better performance per dollar | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | vs | 2.22 pt/W | Around 95% better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 1,863 | vs | 876 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.22 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 7.47 $/year | 3.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 27.16 $/year | 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | Core Duo T2500 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
details | Core Duo T2500 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.22 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.22 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 31W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 27.16 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.22 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core Duo T2500 ![]() | Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
3220 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J3455 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $82 | |
N3150 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $82 | |
J1800 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $82 | |
J2900 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1037U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $82 | |
E3845 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||