CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T2500 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900  based on its performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Duo T2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Duo T2500

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 79,550 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 40% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,336 Around 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2006 Release date over 7 years later
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 25.19W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.29 pt/$ Around 85% better performance per dollar
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 2.22 pt/W Around 95% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly better PassMark score 1,863 vs 876 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2.22 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 7.47 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 27.16 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2500 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core Duo T2500
79,550 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Duo T2500  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Core Duo T2500  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.22 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.22 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 31W 10W
Annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 2.22 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 25.19W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core Duo T2500
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus