0 Comments
| Intel Core Duo T2400 vs L2400 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T2400 vs the L2400. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the L2400 vs the T2400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2400 vs L2400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo T2400
1,403
Core Duo L2400
1,327
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo T2400
787
Core Duo L2400
737
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo T2400
73,900 MB/s
Core Duo L2400
67.5 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo T2400
1,340
Core Duo L2400
1,275
GeekBench
Core Duo T2400
1,870
Core Duo L2400
1,735
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core Duo T2400
795
Core Duo L2400
705
PassMark (Single Core)
Core Duo T2400
564
Core Duo L2400
497
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Duo T2400 | vs | L2400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 31W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | 2.36 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 667 MHz |
details | Core Duo T2400 | vs | L2400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 151,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 1.16 - 1.3V | 1 - 1.21V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 1.84 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 1.84 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core Duo T2400 ![]() | Intel Core Duo L2400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T2400 vs T7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T2400 vs T7600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
T2400 vs T7400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
T2400 vs T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
T2400 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T2400 vs T5600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | $244 | |
L2400 vs L7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||