Intel Core Duo T2400 vs Atom N450 |
Released January, 2006
Intel Core Duo T2400
- 1.83 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core Duo T2400
 | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Atom N450
- 1.66 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N450
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2400 vs Atom N450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Duo T2400 | vs | Atom N450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 31W | 5.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 1.32 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | 4.63 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 4.47W | |
details | Core Duo T2400 | vs | Atom N450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 123,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 11 | 10 | |
| Voltage range | 1.16 - 1.3V | 0.8 - 1.18V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 223.2 | 32.3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Integrated | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Core Duo T2400  Report a correction |  Intel Atom N450 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $64 | $32 | |
| N450 vs N270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $64 | ||
| N450 vs N280 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $64 | $42 | |
| N450 vs N2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $64 | ||
| N450 vs N550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $64 | $289 | |
| N450 vs SU9600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $64 | $64 | |
| N450 vs N455 | ||
 | VS |  |
| T2400 vs T7200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
