Winner
Intel Core Duo T2050
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core Duo T2050 based on its .
See full details Intel Core Duo T2050 vs AMD Sempron 3500+ |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Core Duo T2050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
4.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core Duo T2050
 | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | More cores 2 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3500+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
4.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3500+
| | More advanced architecture x86-64 | | Higher clock speed 2 GHz |
| | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,385 | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.66 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T2050 vs 3500+ among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l2 cache is just OK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| |||||||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,385 | vs | 686 | More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.66 GHz | vs | 2.03 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.93 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 3500+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Duo T2050 | vs | Sempron 3500+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 31W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 27.16 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.8 pt/W | 1.35 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 28.44W | |
details | Core Duo T2050 | vs | Sempron 3500+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.03 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.03 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 533 MHz | 333 MHz | |
 Intel Core Duo T2050  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 3500+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
