CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T2050 vs 3500+ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core Duo T2050 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core Duo T2050  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Duo T2050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Duo T2050

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l2 cache is just OK
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Sempron 3500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3500+

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,385 vs 686 More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.66 GHz vs 2.03 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.93 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2050 vs Sempron 3500+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core Duo T2050
64,500 MB/s
Sempron 3500+
181.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Duo T2050  vs
Sempron 3500+ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
478
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

power consumption

TDP 31W 35W
Annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.8 pt/W 1.35 pt/W
Typical power consumption 25.19W 28.44W

details

Core Duo T2050  vs
Sempron 3500+ 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.03 GHz 2.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.03 GHz 2.66 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 533 MHz 333 MHz
Intel Core Duo T2050
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3500+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus