CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T2050 vs 50 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core Duo T2050 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core Duo T2050  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core Duo T2050

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core Duo T2050

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Duo T2050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Duo T2050

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 64,500 MB/s vs 32,500 MB/s Around 2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,254 vs 722 Around 75% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 25.19W 3.4x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.24 pt/W vs 1.8 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 7.47 $/year 3.4x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 27.16 $/year 3.4x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo T2050 vs AMD C 50

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core Duo T2050
64,500 MB/s
AMD C 50
32,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Duo T2050  vs
AMD C 50 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Core Duo T2050  vs
AMD C 50 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 5
Voltage range 0.76 - 1.3V 1.05 - 1.35V

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6250
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 276 MHz

power consumption

TDP 31W 9W
Annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.8 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 25.19W 7.31W
Intel Core Duo T2050
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus