0 Comments
| Intel Core Duo L2400 vs Atom N270 |
Released January, 2006
Intel Core Duo L2400
- 1.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core Duo L2400
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N270 vs the Core Duo L2400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo L2400 vs Atom N270
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo L2400
1,327
Atom N270
516
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo L2400
737
Atom N270
369
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo L2400
67.5 MB/s
Atom N270
24,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core Duo L2400
1,275
Atom N270
491
GeekBench
Core Duo L2400
1,735
Atom N270
854
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core Duo L2400
705
Atom N270
271
PassMark (Single Core)
Core Duo L2400
497
Atom N270
236
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core Duo L2400 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 2.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.36 pt/W | 9.71 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 2.03W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Core Duo L2400 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.21V | 0.9 - 1.16V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.84 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.67 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.84 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core Duo L2400 ![]() | Intel Atom N270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs N455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $69 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs Pentium 4 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $63 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $47 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs D2550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
Intel Atom N270 vs N550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $42 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs N2600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||