Intel Core Duo L2400 vs Atom N270

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Core Duo L2400 4.7 Atom N270 4.0 Atom Z3735F 5.3
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Core Duo L2400 5.0 Atom N270 4.3 Atom Z3735F 4.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core Duo L2400 0.0 Atom N270 0.0 Atom Z3735F n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core Duo L2400 0.0 Atom N270 0.0 Atom Z3735F n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core Duo L2400 4.0 Atom N270 5.6 Atom Z3735F 10.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core Duo L2400 n.d. Atom N270 5.3 Atom Z3735F 10.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

0.9	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Core Duo L2400 0.0 Atom N270 0.9 Atom Z3735F 7.6

Winner
Intel Core Duo L2400

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core Duo L2400 based on its features.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Core Duo L2400

Front view of Intel Core Duo L2400

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Intel Atom N270

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Core Duo L2400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Duo L2400

Report a correction

Has virtualization support

Yes

vs

No

Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N270 vs the Core Duo L2400.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,327

516

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

737

369

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

67.5 MB/s

24,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,275

491

GeekBench

1,735

854

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

705

271

PassMark (Single Core)

497

236

summary	Core Duo L2400	vs	Atom N270
Clock speed	1.66 GHz		1.6 GHz
Cores	Dual core		Single core
Socket type
479
437
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		No
Has virtualization support	Yes		No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	15W		2.5W
Annual home energy cost	3.61 $/year		0.6 $/year
Performance per watt	2.36 pt/W		9.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption	12.19W		2.03W
bus
Architecture	FSB		FSB
Number of links	1		1
Clock speed	667 MHz		533 MHz

details	Core Duo L2400	vs	Atom N270
Architecture	x86		x86
Threads	2		2
L2 cache	2 MB		0.5 MB
L2 cache per core	1 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	65 nm		45 nm
Transistor count	151,000,000		47,000,000
Max CPUs	1		1
Clock multiplier	10		12
Voltage range	1 - 1.21V		0.9 - 1.16V
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	1.84 GHz		1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.67 GHz		1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	1.84 GHz		1.87 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	None		None
Label	N/A		N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A		N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A		N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A		N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A		N/A
3DMark06	N/A		N/A

Intel Core Duo L2400

Report a correction

Intel Atom N270

Report a correction

VS

Intel Core Duo L2400 vs Core2 Duo L7500

VS

Intel Atom N270 vs N450

Comments

comments powered by Disqus