Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core Duo L2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Duo L2300

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Atom N550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N550

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core Duo L2300 vs Atom N550

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core Duo L2300  vs
Atom N550 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 8.5W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 2.05 $/year
Performance per watt 2.81 pt/W 3.26 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 6.91W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Core Duo L2300  vs
Atom N550 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 151,000,000 176,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.76 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 1.76 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated
GPU clock speed N/A 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Core Duo L2300
Report a correction
Intel Atom N550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus