Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron U3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron U3400

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the SU2300 vs the U3400.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron U3400 vs SU2300

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron U3400  vs
SU2300 
Clock speed 1.06 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1288
BGA 956

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 18W 10W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 2.41 $/year
Performance per watt 2.14 pt/W 5.18 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 8.13W

details

Celeron U3400  vs
SU2300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.07 GHz 1.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.07 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.07 GHz 1.44 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 166 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 500 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron U3400
Report a correction
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus