Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron U3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron U3400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron U3400 vs the AMD E1 1200.

Front view of AMD E1 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E1 1200 vs the Intel Celeron U3400.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron U3400 vs E1 1200

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

E1 1200
1,310

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron U3400  vs
E1 1200 
Clock speed 1.06 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 18W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 2.14 pt/W 2.33 pt/W
Typical power consumption 14.63W 14.63W

details

Celeron U3400  vs
E1 1200 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.07 GHz 1.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.07 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.07 GHz 1.41 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 7310
Intel Celeron U3400
Report a correction
AMD E1 1200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus