CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T3500 vs E3400 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron T3500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron T3500

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 2.47 pt/W vs 1.64 pt/W More than 50% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Sep, 2010 vs Jan, 2010 Release date 8 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron E3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3400

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 110,600 MB/s vs 88,800 MB/s Around 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,275 vs 1,843 Around 25% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better performance per dollar 2.54 pt/$ vs 1.08 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,483 vs 1,925 Around 30% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron T3500 vs E3400

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron T3500
88,800 MB/s
Celeron E3400
110,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron T3500  vs
E3400 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
478
P
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.47 pt/W 1.64 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W

details

Celeron T3500  vs
E3400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.13 GHz 3.85 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.13 GHz 3.85 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Celeron T3500
Report a correction
Intel Celeron E3400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus