Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron T3500

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron T3500

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron T3500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron T3500

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark (Single core) score 844 vs 663 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly better performance per watt 2.47 pt/W vs 1.84 pt/W Around 35% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3100+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3100+

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 28.44W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron T3500 vs Athlon 64 3100+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron T3500  vs
Athlon 64 3100+ 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
462
754
AM2
P
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 400 MHz

details

Celeron T3500  vs
Athlon 64 3100+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.13 GHz 2.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.13 GHz 2.47 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 25W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 2.47 pt/W 1.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 20.31W
Intel Celeron T3500
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3100+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus