0 Comments
| Intel Celeron T3300 vs 900 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T3300 vs the 900. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 900 vs the T3300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron T3300 vs 900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron T3300
1,891
Celeron 900
1,094
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron T3300
1,051
Celeron 900
1,102
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron T3300
84,700 MB/s
Celeron 900
88,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron T3300
1,792
Celeron 900
1,046
GeekBench
Celeron T3300
2,195
Celeron 900
1,767
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron T3300
1,210
Celeron 900
678
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron T3300
798
Celeron 900
782
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron T3300 | vs | 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
P | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.37 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Celeron T3300 | vs | 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.67 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Celeron T3300 ![]() | Intel Celeron 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | ||
Intel Pentium T4500 vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $70 | |
Intel Pentium T4400 vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 3120M vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$62 | $70 | |
Intel Celeron T3100 vs 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | $70 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T7250 vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $70 | |
Intel Core2 Duo P8600 vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel Core2 Duo T9500 vs Celeron T3300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||