Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron T3000

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron T3000

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron T3000 vs the Celeron M 550.

Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Celeron T3000.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron T3000 vs M 550

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron T3000  vs
M 550 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 0.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
P
479
495

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 35W 4W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 0.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 3.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 100 MHz

details

Celeron T3000  vs
M 550 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.27 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron T3000
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus