Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the SU2300 vs the N2840.

Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron SU2300 vs N2840

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron SU2300
51,300 MB/s
Celeron N2840
60,300 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron SU2300  vs
N2840 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.16 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 792 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron SU2300  vs
N2840 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.44 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 2.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.44 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 1.81 $/year
Performance per watt 5.18 pt/W 7.05 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 6.09W
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus