CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of SU2300 vs 1000M among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 1000M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 1000M  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the SU2300 vs the 1000M.

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron SU2300 vs 1000M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron SU2300
51,300 MB/s
Celeron 1000M
93,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron SU2300  vs
1000M 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 956
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 5.22 pt/W 2.12 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W

details

Celeron SU2300  vs
1000M 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.44 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.44 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 100 MHz
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus