Intel Celeron SU2300 vs Atom D525 |
Released September, 2009
Intel Celeron SU2300
- 1.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron SU2300
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released June, 2010
Intel Atom D525
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Atom D525
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron SU2300 vs Atom D525
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron SU2300 | vs | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 13W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.13 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.18 pt/W | 2.62 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 10.56W | |
details | Celeron SU2300 | vs | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 176,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 2.12 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.44 GHz | 2.12 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Integrated | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron SU2300  Report a correction |  Intel Atom D525 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $63 | $82 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs D2550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | $225 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | ||
| Intel Atom D525 vs AMD E 350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | $134 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | $32 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs N270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $63 | $72 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
