0 Comments
| Intel Celeron SU2300 vs Atom D525 |
Released September, 2009
Intel Celeron SU2300
- 1.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron SU2300
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released June, 2010
Intel Atom D525
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Atom D525
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron SU2300 vs Atom D525
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron SU2300
1,221
Atom D525
1,038
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron SU2300
690
Atom D525
432
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron SU2300
51,300 MB/s
Atom D525
28,100 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron SU2300
1,168
Atom D525
1,010
GeekBench
Celeron SU2300
1,498
Atom D525
1,659
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron SU2300
1,000
Atom D525
891
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron SU2300
782
Atom D525
701
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron SU2300
486
Atom D525
284
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron SU2300 | vs | Atom D525 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 13W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.13 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.18 pt/W | 2.62 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 10.56W |
details | Celeron SU2300 | vs | Atom D525 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 176,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 2.12 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.44 GHz | 2.12 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Integrated | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron SU2300 ![]() | Intel Atom D525 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $47 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs D2550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $82 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $72 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $225 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | ||
Intel Atom D525 vs AMD E 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $134 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $43 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs 330 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||