Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 64

AMD Turion 64 X2 64

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better performance per watt 5.18 pt/W vs 1.82 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
Newer Sep, 2009 vs May, 2006 Release date over 3 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 64

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 64

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,340 vs 1,000 Around 35% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 655 vs 486 Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.76 GHz vs 1.44 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron SU2300 vs Turion 64 X2 64

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron SU2300  vs
Turion 64 X2 64 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 956
S1
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 5.18 pt/W 1.82 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W

details

Celeron SU2300  vs
Turion 64 X2 64 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.44 GHz 1.76 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.44 GHz 1.76 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 64
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus