Winner
Intel Celeron N3150
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3150 based on its .
See full details Intel Celeron N3150 vs N3050 |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3150 vs N3050 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3150 vs the N3050. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3050 vs the N3150. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs N3050
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3150 | vs | N3050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.08 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.68 pt/W | 8.65 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron N3150 | vs | N3050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.75 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.75 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 320 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Celeron N3150  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron N3050 Report a correction |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 5 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3150, starting from $225
- 26 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3050, starting from $145
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $107 | |
| N2840 vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $21 | $107 | |
| x5-Z8300 vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | $107 | |
| 4005U vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $107 | |
| N3700 vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | $107 | |
| Z3735F vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| N3060 vs N3050 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $107 | |
| J1900 vs N3150 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $145 | $125 | |
| E8400 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
