0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N3150 vs N3050 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3150 vs the N3050. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3050 vs the N3150. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs N3050
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N3150
7.75 mHash/s
Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Celeron N3150
4.72 mPixels/s
Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N3150
0.48 fps
Celeron N3050
0.44 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3150
2,712
Celeron N3050
1,584
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3150
835
Celeron N3050
879
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3150
335.9 MB/s
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N3150
1,674
Celeron N3050
885
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N3150
470
Celeron N3050
467
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3150 | vs | N3050 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.08 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.68 pt/W | 8.65 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N3150 | vs | N3050 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.75 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.75 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 320 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel Celeron N3150 ![]() | Intel Celeron N3050 ![]() |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 5 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3150, starting from $225
- 26 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3050, starting from $145
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
N2840 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $107 | |
N3700 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $107 | |
4005U vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Z3735F vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $107 | |
x5-Z8300 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N3060 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
J1900 vs N3150 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||