CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3150 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Celeron N3150
5.1
Celeron J1900
5.1
Core i3 3220
3.6
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Celeron N3150
5.2
Celeron J1900
5.3
Core i3 3220
6.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Celeron N3150
n.d.
Celeron J1900
n.d.
Core i3 3220
1.5
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Celeron N3150
6.0
Celeron J1900
5.1
Core i3 3220
4.9
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Celeron N3150
8.1
Celeron J1900
6.7
Core i3 3220
5.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Celeron N3150
n.d.
Celeron J1900
n.d.
Core i3 3220
6.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
8.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Celeron N3150
8.4
Celeron J1900
7.7
Core i3 3220
6.4

Winner
Intel Celeron N3150 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3150  based on its power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron N3150

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Celeron N3150
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1900

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.72 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s More than 12x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 10.68 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per dollar 0.6 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 15% better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 335.9 MB/s Around 169.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 2.08 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.75 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs J1900

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3150
7.75 mHash/s
Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron N3150
4.72 mPixels/s
Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3150
0.48 fps
Celeron J1900
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3150
2,712
Celeron J1900
2,927

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3150
835
Celeron J1900
924

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3150
335.9 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron N3150
1,674
Celeron J1900
1,863

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron N3150
470
Celeron J1900
534

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron N3150  vs
J1900 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.08 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 688 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

 Celeron N3150  vs
J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption
TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 10.68 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss