Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 10.68 pt/W vs 5.62 pt/W Around 90% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 3215U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3215U

Report a correction
Better PassMark (Single core) score 883 vs 470 Around 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 0.79 pt/$ vs 0.6 pt/$ More than 30% better performance per dollar
Newer Apr, 2015 vs Jan, 2015 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs 3215U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3150  vs
3215U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 10.68 pt/W 5.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N3150  vs
3215U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 1.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 300 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3215U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus