Intel Celeron N3150 vs Atom Z3590 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3150
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N3150
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Atom Z3590
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3590
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.5 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz |
| | Newer Jul, 2015 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| |||||||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.75 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date 6 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs Atom Z3590
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3150 | vs | Atom Z3590 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron N3150 | vs | Atom Z3590 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.75 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.75 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 4,096 MB | |
 Intel Celeron N3150  Report a correction |  Intel Atom Z3590 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $107 | |
| Intel Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel J3455 vs Celeron N3150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs N3150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel J3160 vs Celeron N3150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel N3160 vs Celeron N3150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i3 4030U vs Celeron N3150 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
