CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3150 vs 58 among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N3150 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3150  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 58

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 58

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 X2 58 vs the Intel Celeron N3150.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs Turion 64 X2 58

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3150
335.9 MB/s
Turion 64 X2 58
51,850 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3150  vs
Turion 64 X2 58 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES

details

Celeron N3150  vs
Turion 64 X2 58 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 6W 31W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 7.47 $/year
Performance per watt 10.68 pt/W 2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 25.19W
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 58
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus