CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3150 vs 145 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N3150 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3150  based on its performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 36.56W 7.5x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 10.68 pt/W vs 2.06 pt/W Around 5.2x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jan, 2015 vs May, 2010 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 7.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 7.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 145

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 145

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 3.09 pt/$ vs 0.6 pt/$ Around 5.2x better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,409 vs 835 Around 70% better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.28 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs Sempron 145

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3150
335.9 MB/s
Sempron 145
111,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3150  vs
Sempron 145 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 45W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 10.68 pt/W 2.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 36.56W

details

Celeron N3150  vs
Sempron 145 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 4.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 4.28 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 4.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 145
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus