Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher turbo clock speed 2.08 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 for AIOs 7110

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 for AIOs 7110

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 90% higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Celeron N3150  vs E2 for AIOs 7110 

clock speed

turbo clock speed

Celeron N3150
2.08 GHz

L2 cache

gpu clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Celeron N3150  vs
E2 for AIOs 7110 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.08 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core


Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type


Celeron N3150  vs
E2 for AIOs 7110 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ R2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
AMD E2 for AIOs 7110
Report a correction

Read more


comments powered by Disqus