Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better PassMark score 1,674 vs 544 More than 3x better PassMark score
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 653 vs 470 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3150 vs Athlon 64 3400+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3150  vs
Athlon 64 3400+ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES

details

Celeron N3150  vs
Athlon 64 3400+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 4.88W N/A
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus