Intel Celeron N3150 vs AMD A4 5000

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Celeron N3150 6.2 A4 5000 4.2 Pentium N3700 6.3
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Celeron N3150 5.0 A4 5000 5.7 Pentium N3700 5.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Celeron N3150 n.d. A4 5000 0.0 Pentium N3700 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Celeron N3150 5.5 A4 5000 5.7 Pentium N3700 5.8
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Celeron N3150 6.9 A4 5000 4.6 Pentium N3700 7.1
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Celeron N3150 n.d. A4 5000 6.3 Pentium N3700 7.4
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Celeron N3150 5.6 A4 5000 3.0 Pentium N3700 6.4

Winner
Intel Celeron N3150

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3150 based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Celeron N3150

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Front view of AMD A4 5000

AMD A4 5000

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N3150 vs the AMD A4 5000.

Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD A4 5000 vs the Intel Celeron N3150.

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

7.75 mHash/s

16.17 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

4.72 mPixels/s

2.9 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

0.48 fps

0.41 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,712

2,562

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

835

842

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

335.9 MB/s

752,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

1,674

1,898

PassMark (Single Core)

470

745

summary	Celeron N3150	vs	A4 5000
Clock speed	1.6 GHz		1.55 GHz
Turbo clock speed	2.08 GHz		0 GHz
Cores	Quad core		Quad core
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		No
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
Channels	Dual Channel		Single Channel
Supports ECC	No		No
Maximum bandwidth	25,600 MB/s		12,800 MB/s

details	Celeron N3150	vs	A4 5000
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	4		4
L2 cache	2 MB		2 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	14 nm		28 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU		GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics		Radeon HD 8330
power consumption
TDP	6W		13.5W
Annual home energy cost	1.45 $/year		3.25 $/year
Performance per watt	10.68 pt/W		13.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption	4.88W		10.97W

Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction

AMD A4 5000

Report a correction

VS

Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3150

VS

Intel Core i3 3217U vs AMD A4 5000

Comments

comments powered by Disqus