Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N3150 vs the AMD A4 1350.

Front view of AMD A4 1350

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 1350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD A4 1350 vs the Intel Celeron N3150.

Features Key features of the Celeron N3150  vs A4 1350 

clock speed

Celeron N3150
1.6 GHz
A4 1350
1 GHz

L2 cache

gpu clock speed

Celeron N3150
320 MHz
A4 1350
300 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3150  vs
A4 1350 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.08 GHz None
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s

details

Celeron N3150  vs
A4 1350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8210
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 300 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 8W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.93 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.88W 6.5W
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction
AMD A4 1350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus