Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3050 vs the N3000.

Front view of Intel Celeron N3000

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3000

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3000 vs the N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs N3000

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
N3000 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.04 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz 2.08 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 4W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 0.96 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 11.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 3.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N3050  vs
N3000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 1.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 1.04 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3000
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus