Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs M 550

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
M 550 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 0.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 6W 4W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 0.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.88W 3.25W

details

Celeron N3050  vs
M 550 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 2.27 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus