CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3050 vs J1800 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N3050 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3050  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron N3050

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.48 mPixels/s vs 1.15 mPixels/s Around 4x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better performance per watt 8.65 pt/W vs 3.97 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz vs 2.16 GHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 2.14 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.55 pt/$ vs 0.48 pt/$ Around 15% better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs J1800

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s
Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3050
69.59 fps
Celeron J1800
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
J1800 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.41 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz 2.58 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 688 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron N3050  vs
J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus