0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs 1037U |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N3050 vs the 1037U. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1037U vs the N3050. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs 1037U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s
Celeron 1037U
3.03 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s
Celeron 1037U
4.01 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N3050
0.44 fps
Celeron 1037U
0.39 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
1,584
Celeron 1037U
2,571
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
879
Celeron 1037U
1,468
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N3050
885
Celeron 1037U
1,733
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N3050
467
Celeron 1037U
952
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3050 | vs | 1037U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.65 pt/W | 5.02 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N3050 | vs | 1037U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.14 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.14 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 350 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Celeron N3050 ![]() | Intel Celeron 1037U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
N3050 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $161 | |
N3050 vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $275 | |
N3050 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $17 | |
N3050 vs Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $21 | |
N3050 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N3050 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1037U vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||