0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N3050
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.48 mPixels/s | ![]() | Slightly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
VS
Released April, 2015
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Atom x5 x5-Z8300
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 279,050 MB/s | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 5.43 pt/$ |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 19.9 | ![]() | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.84 GHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.48 mPixels/s | vs | 3.93 mPixels/s | Around 15% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Slightly higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.44 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 60% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.14 GHz | vs | 1.53 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 279,050 MB/s | vs | 350.4 MB/s | Around 796.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 5.43 pt/$ | vs | 0.48 pt/$ | Around 11.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 19.9 | vs | 18.5 | Around 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 2,187 | vs | 1,584 | Around 40% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date 3 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
5.83 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
3.93 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N3050
0.44 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
0.41 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
1,584
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
2,187
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
879
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
761
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
279,050 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N3050
885
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1,204
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N3050
467
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
389
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom x5 x5-Z8300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.44 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.84 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom x5 x5-Z8300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.14 GHz | 1.53 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.44 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.14 GHz | 1.53 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 2,048 MB |
Intel Celeron N3050 ![]() | Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $17 | |
x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | ||
x5-Z8300 vs x5-Z8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
N3050 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $161 | |
N3050 vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $275 | |
N3050 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $17 | |
N3050 vs Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N3050 vs N3060 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||