Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N3050 vs the Atom Z3735F. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3735F vs the Celeron N3050. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 2.2W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 8.65 pt/W | 60.81 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 1.79W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.14 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.14 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 311 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3RS-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 2,048 MB | |
 Intel Celeron N3050  Report a correction |  Intel Atom Z3735F Report a correction |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 26 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3050, starting from $145
- 5 laptops with the Intel Atom Z3735F, starting from $175
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $21 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $17 | |
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | ||
| Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $32 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom Z3740 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $107 | |
| Intel Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Celeron N3050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
