0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N3050 vs the Atom Z3735F. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3735F vs the Celeron N3050. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
1,584
Atom Z3735F
2,148
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
879
Atom Z3735F
778
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron N3050
18.5
Atom Z3735F
21.3
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N3050
885
Atom Z3735F
908
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N3050
467
Atom Z3735F
350
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 2.2W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.65 pt/W | 60.81 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 1.79W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.14 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.14 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 311 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
DDR3RS-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 2,048 MB |
Intel Celeron N3050 ![]() | Intel Atom Z3735F ![]() |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 26 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3050, starting from $145
- 5 laptops with the Intel Atom Z3735F, starting from $175
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $17 | |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $17 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | ||
Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $17 | |
Intel Atom Z3740 vs Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $107 | |
Intel Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $107 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Celeron N3050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
aknit✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ (10:33 PM, July 29, 2016)