0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom N570 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N3050
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N570 vs the Celeron N3050. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Atom N570
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
1,584
Atom N570
965
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
879
Atom N570
396
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Atom N570
26,200 MB/s
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron N3050
18.5
Atom N570
738
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N3050
885
Atom N570
577
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N3050
467
Atom N570
257
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom N570 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 8.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 2.05 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.65 pt/W | 3.62 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 6.91W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N3050 | vs | Atom N570 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.14 GHz | 1.82 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.14 GHz | 1.82 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Integrated | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 2,048 MB |
Intel Celeron N3050 ![]() | Intel Atom N570 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $107 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $107 | |
Intel Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
Intel N3060 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $107 | |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $107 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||